Redevelopment of London Road

What do residents think about plans for another supermarket?
By Peter Crowhurst, North Laine resident
A brighter London Road?

On 23rd April 2008 I went to an event called 'Bright London Road'.  I could have been forgiven for thinking it was going to be about the regeneration of London Road. However, soon after I arrived I got talking to one of the people involved in the event and he was a representative for Tesco's, or at least for one of its subsidiaries. Looking at the displays on land ownership in London Road and talking to other people on duty it became clear that what was on offer was the development of a Tesco superstore to be built on land now occupied by Vantage Point.

Who are St James's Investments?

The exhibition was organised by St James's Investments who have been buying up land in the London Road area and who currently own Vantage Point, the parade of shops nearby and many other properties in the vicinity. 'What is this to do with Tesco?'  you might ask. Well, St James's Investments is a company that works with Tesco to acquire land that Tesco leases for its stores.

Tesco would like to build a superstore on the corner of New England Hill with London Road and to do this they want (through St James's Investments) to buy up the land between Vantage Point and New England House. Some of this land is owned by the Council, who would have to sell for the scheme to go ahead.

Local councillors organise a meeting to test local opinion

On 9th May 2008 I attended a meeting organised by the councillors of the area affected to discuss the proposals and what could be done by opponents of the scheme. The meeting discussed the good points about London Road (its community feel, the variety of small shops, the existence of a market, the importance of bus transport to the area and the appeal of the area to less wealthy groups within our society) and also what is lacking in the area (a thriving open market, green spaces for all, pedestrian friendly areas).

Will Tesco encourage other shops into the area?

Tesco suggests that a superstore could help to revive the whole area and attract other shops into the area. They argue that a department store is what the London Road area needs after the closure of the Coop. It is certainly the case that London Road was at its most vibrant when there was a Mark & Spencer, Woolworth's, Boots and Sainsbury's. Opponents of the scheme, however, maintain that a Tesco superstore would turn London Road into another cloned high street, destroying the soul of the area and, by forcing rents up, making it very difficult for small, independent shops to exist.

The NLCA discusses Tesco

The question of Tesco building a superstore was discussed at the May 2008 NLCA meeting and there was general condemnation of the project given Tesco's dominance of the retail sector and the way that small independent shops tend to suffer and often close down. There are already two supermarkets in the area - does the area really need a third? The generation of traffic in an area of already poor air quality was another concern raised. But does the condemnation of Tesco nationwide just reflect the concerns of a middle class group and have nothing to do with what a lot of the local residents might want. After all Tesco does provide a one stop shop.

What do you think? Let us have your views.

This page was added on 14/05/2008.

Comments/reviews:

I totally agree with all these comments, we certainly do not need another supermarket.

By Sharon Carter
On 31/05/2008

Might not a large Tesco attract shoppers to an otherwise down at heel area?

By Philip Jones
On 16/07/2008

Peter - I am totally in agreement with you on this issue.  London Road already has ALDI, Sainsburys and Somerfield - it doesn't need another supermarket.  Tescos are being very disingenuous when they call it a "department store".  It won't be - it will be a supermarket and with their buying power they will put other small shops out of business. No-one can compete with them.  They are already showing their credentials by the fact that they have another company secretly buying up the land and properties all around. They know people would oppose them if they did it in a fair and open manner.

By Chris Beaumont
On 01/06/2009

It was reported in June 09 that Tesco and St James's Investment (SJI) had severed their ties following the massive public anger over their plans for the 'rejuvenation' of London Road. As Peter explains in his article above, SJI had wanted to build a large development of homes, shops and offices around a Tesco superstore but huge opposition emerged during the public consultation. A petition signed by more than 1,000 people against SJI and Tesco's plans was handed to Brighton and Hove City Council by campaign group' Another London Road'. Now both parties have agreed to go their separate ways, pointing to the negative public reaction as a major factor in their decision.

However, although no longer working together, both SJI and Tesco have bought up property around London Road and are still interested in pursuing separate developments, although business leaders believe the end of the partnership will mean that any proposed schemes will now have to be on a much smaller-scale, if they go ahead at all. In the current economic climate SJI will probably be tempted to wait out the recession before deciding what to do with the large tracts of the London Road area that they now control.

Earlier this year the city council unveiled a proposed Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) for London Road, which would act as a blueprint for how it would like the area to be developed. The proposals included transforming the district into a Parisian-style tree-lined boulevard, a new public square and opening up the back streets to establish a cafe culture. The public consultation on this document closed in July 2009.

[Source: The Argus]

By Jackie Fuller
On 02/08/2009

Add a comment about this page





 

Look at this!